A revolution to save America.

As I have said before, I think that it is high time that we get rid of government. While I do not like the idea of open revolution, I think that it may be necessary. I do have ideas for a plan, but that is not relevant.
I believe that at this point in history, the only way to preserve the dream of America is to end government. Government is an immoral, evil institution, and its existence threatens the moral foundation that made once made America great. I do think that markets will exist for defense, transportation, and other functions that the U.S. government claims to provide. However, at the end of the day, to be honest, I really do not give a damn. The non-aggression principle defines how all humans must treat each other, and governments violate that principle.
In truth, governments are nothing more than groups of individuals who claim that the non-aggression principle does not apply to themselves, that they may rob, or defraud, or threaten as they please. Their actions are aggressive and immoral, and I desire to protect humanity from the aggression of these people. I believe, in short, that we must end government, not only here in America, but throughout the world, in order to save humanity and liberty.

Economics and Ethics

Here, read this, and attempt to understand the true nature of our economy, our market, before calling for regulation. Everything that we see in American business is the result of government distortion. The structure and operation of a corporation are restricted and shaped by the tangles of federal and state corporate laws. The boom/bust cycle of the dollar is the result of socialized central banking. The problems everyone complains about are what we get for allowing a group of people to commit massive violations of the basic ethic of the non-aggression principle. Read this writing on the non-aggression principle. Not only are the current regulations unethical, they also cause most of the problems of our economy. This is no free market. Unfortunately, we seem bent on learning that “Middle-of-the-Road Policy Leads to Socialism” the hard way.

“You Can’t Vote On My Freedom”

(At least, you shouldn’t be able to.)
I was talking to my sister earlier, (I am at home this weekend), and she was explaining that she has to write an essay about when she was discriminated against. I told her that under the concept of Freedom of Association most cases of “discrimination” are, while stupid and mean, not a problem that should be solved through government intervention. (Which is true for most situations. Were we not raised to believe that “violence is not the answer”? Hmm.) Anyway, she asked about voting and voting discrimination, and I made the above statement.